Amicus Briefs

December 14, 2017 | Filed under: Credit Reporting
Court:
US Supreme Court

Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners in Ohio et al vs. American Express

July 20, 2017 | Filed under: Credit Reporting | Tagged with: Credit Cards
Court:
US Court of Appeals - Second Circuit

Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees in Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman

August 17, 2016 | Filed under: Credit Reporting | Tagged with: FCRA
Court:
US District Court - Northern District of Georgia

Amicus Brief in Support of Plantiffs-Appellees in Pedro vs Equifax & TransUnion

July 12, 2016 | Filed under: Credit Reporting
Court:

Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants in Daniel B. Storm, et al, v. Paytime Inc, et al

January 25, 2016 | Filed under: Credit Reporting
Court:
US Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit

Amicus Brief in support of the plaintiffs-appellees in Mohamed vs. Uber Technologies

January 11, 2016 | Filed under: Credit Reporting | Tagged with: Class Actions
Court:
US Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit

Amicus Brief in Support of Respondents in Spokeo vs. Thomas Robins

May 27, 2015 | Filed under: Credit Reporting | Tagged with: Mortgage
Court:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants in James McCalmont, Et Al, vs. Federal National Mortgage Association/Fannie Mae, Et Al.

May 26, 2015 | Filed under: Credit Reporting
Court:
California Court of Appeals

Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants in Connor vs First Student. 

August 11, 2014 | Filed under: Credit Reporting
Court:
US District Court - Middle District of Northern California

This brief requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion to dismiss this case regarding fair reporting on criminal background checks.  

September 20, 2010 | Filed under: Credit Reporting
Court:
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

The Panel’s decision is contrary to the plain language of the FCRA and nullifies its requirement to filter out unverifiable information, the panel’s decision establishes a de facto technical accuracy standard, contrary to existing circuit precedent; and the Panel’s decision ignores the grave responsibilities that Congress Imposed on CRAs.
 

Pages