FCRA

American Bankers Association, et al. v. Lockyer, Attorney General, 9th Circuit

Publish Date: 
September 8, 2004
Type: 
amicus_brief

NACA, together with AARP, ACLU of Northern California, California Public Interest Research Group, Consumer Federation of California, Consumers Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Evan Hendricks, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, and US PIRG, filed this amicus brief in the Ninth Circuit, supporting the California Financial Information Privacy Act, Cal. Fin. Code § 4050 et seq. (2004), popularly known as "SB1." This brief was written by Chris Hoofnagle of Electronic Privacy Information Center.
 

Wadley v. Experian, 4th District Court, Final

Publish Date: 
March 27, 2006
Type: 
amicus_brief

The District Court erroneously accepted Experian's "accuracy only" argument and improperly dismissed the claim regarding its reinventigation duties. Because the District Court was misled by Experian regarding both the statutory scheme and this Court's case law, the court erred by not discussing the difference in the duties that Congress has required. The District Court's omission is shown by the absence of any citation to § 1681i and the lack of any discussion regarding the law and facts of this reinvestigation claim.
 

Cases 08-13510-BB and 08-13616-BB (consolidated), Bobbie Harris v. Mexican Specialty Foods, Inc. and Julie Best Grimes v. Rave Motion Pictures, Birmingham, LLC et al, In The United States Court of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit

Publish Date: 
January 9, 2009
Type: 
amicus_brief

Congress’s findings and statement of purpose when it enacted the FCRA, its ongoing oversight, and its recent amendments demonstrate the significance it rightly placed on the integrity and confidentiality of the nation’s consumer reporting system. Congress also recognized that public enforcement agencies do not have the capability to enforce the FCRA by themselves.

Subscribe to RSS - FCRA