BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//NACA - ECPv6.17.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.consumeradvocates.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for NACA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20200308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20201101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20210314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20211107T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20220313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20221106T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20210715
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20210716
DTSTAMP:20220128T023200Z
CREATED:20210715T120033Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220128T023200Z
UID:2374-1626307200-1626393599@www.consumeradvocates.org
SUMMARY:TransUnion v. Ramirez - Part I: What Does the Supreme Court's Decision Mean for your FCRA Practice
DESCRIPTION:The Supreme Court’s decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez\, U.S.\, 2021 WL 2599472 (U.S. June 25\, 2021) will change the way that federal courts analyze standing. This session considers the impact of the decision on claims brought under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Familiarity with FCRA litigation is recommended. \nThis webinar was sponsored by the National Association of Consumer Advocates\, the National Consumer Law Center\, and Public Justice. \n\nWhat You will Learn\n\nHow to select and plead cases to establish standing in FCRA cases after Ramirez.\nHow the Ramirez decision alters the approach to standing established by the Supreme Court in Spokeo\n\n\nSpeakers\nLauren KW Brennan is an attorney at Francis Mailman Soumilas\, PC. in Philadelphia.  Lauren concentrates her practice on consumer class actions\, particularly under the FCRA.  She was on the trial and appeal teams in Ramirez. \nMichelle Drake is a Shareholder at Berger Montague PC\, where she supervises the firm’s Minneapolis office. Ms. Drake focuses her practice on consumer protection\, improper credit reporting\, and financial services class actions. \nJohn Soumilas is a shareholder at Francis Mailman Soumilas\, PC.  Based in the firm’s Philadelphia office\, John is known for his work in consumer class actions and also for trying cases under the FCRA\, including his work as lead trial counsel in Ramirez and in Cortez v. Trans Union\, LLC.
URL:https://www.consumeradvocates.org/events/online-training-courses/transunion-v-ramirez-part-i-what-does-the-supreme-courts-decision-mean-for-your-fcra-practice/
CATEGORIES:Online Training Courses
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20210721
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20210722
DTSTAMP:20220128T023200Z
CREATED:20210721T120018Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220128T023200Z
UID:2371-1626825600-1626911999@www.consumeradvocates.org
SUMMARY:TransUnion v. Ramirez - Part II: What does the Supreme Court's decision mean for your FDCPA practice
DESCRIPTION:The Supreme Court’s decision in TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez\, U.S.\, 2021 WL 2599472 (U.S. June 25\, 2021) will change the way that federal courts analyze standing. This session considers the impact of the decision on claims brought under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Familiarity with FDCPA litigation and the Ramirez decision is recommended. \nFor more background about the holding in Ramirez\, please see TransUnion v. Ramirez – Part I: What does the Supreme Court’s decision mean for your FCRA practice. \nThis webinar was sponsored by the National Association of Consumer Advocates\, the National Consumer Law Center\, and Public Justice. \n\nWhat You will Learn\n\nHow to establish standing in FDCPA cases after Ramirez.\nHow the Ramirez decision alters the approach to standing established by the Supreme Court in Spokeo\n\n\nSpeakers\nJames Francis (Muhlenberg College\, B.A. 1992; Temple University\, J.D. 1995) has focused on consumer protection litigation\, concentrating on the FCRA\, FDCPA\, and consumer class actions. He was trial counsel in the Ramirez case\, argued the seminal FCRA case of Cortez v. TransUnion before the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals\, was certified to serve as Class counsel in over thirty class actions\, was involved in the trial of two class actions to verdict and has received some of the largest FCRA settlements in history. \nCassandra P. Miller is a Partner at Edelman Combs Latturner & Goodwin\, LLC\, specializing in the practice of consumer law – both individual and class action litigation. She has been appointed class counsel in numerous federal class actions that have resulted in significant recovery to consumers. Cassandra has spent her legal career helping consumers subjected to unfair and abusive debt collection efforts; helping consumers correct credit reporting errors; and protecting individuals from deceptive business practices. \nDick Rubin\, Of Counsel to Gupta Wessler PLLC\, is a nationally preeminent consumer law expert and appellate advocate whose string of victories in the federal courts of appeals has helped set the contours of current federal consumer protection law\, particularly with respect to debt collection practices and credit reporting. For the past 30 years\, Dick has limited his practice to handling federal appeals arising under federal consumer protection statutes. During this period of concentration on appellate advocacy\, Dick has appeared before the court of appeals for almost every federal circuit.
URL:https://www.consumeradvocates.org/events/online-training-courses/transunion-v-ramirez-part-ii-what-does-the-supreme-courts-decision-mean-for-your-fdcpa-practice/
CATEGORIES:Online Training Courses
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR