BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//NACA - ECPv6.17.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:NACA
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://www.consumeradvocates.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for NACA
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20200308T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20201101T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20210314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20211107T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20220313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20221106T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20211116
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20211117
DTSTAMP:20240819T151948Z
CREATED:20211116T130008Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240819T151948Z
UID:2350-1637020800-1637107199@www.consumeradvocates.org
SUMMARY:Navigating a State Practice Post-Ramirez
DESCRIPTION:In TransUnion v. Ramirez\, the Supreme Court’s ruling gave license to U.S. District Courts to systematically dismiss consumer claims for lack of Article III standing. Despite Congress’s creation of statutes that regulate businesses and provide statutory damages for those victimized by the illegal practices\, federal courts have now set higher standards on what is an injury that creates standing. This webinar will address whether state court adjudication of federal statutory individual or class claims is a feasible alternative to federal court in light of Ramirez. \nThis webinar seeks to teach lawyers to identify what types of consumer claims can be brought in state court and will provide tools for attorneys to use in making the determination to bring claims in state court on an individual or class basis. \n\nWhat You Will Learn\n\nWhat types of claims that are failing in federal court can be sustained in state court\nWhen it is better to file claims in state court rather than federal court\nWhat adjustments to your case management methods must be made\nWhat considerations are needed for asserting federal statutory claims in state court\nHow to determine if your state court follows or does not follow Article III jurisdictional principles\nHow to handle the potential that your case may be removed to federal court\nWhat to consider if the defendant does remove\nWhat typical arguments defendants may make in seeking dismissal of your claims in state court\n\n\nSpeakers\nLarry P. Smith is a consumer attorney\, handling matters involving the FCRA\, FDCPA\, EFTA\, and state consumer fraud/UDAP matters for more than nineteen years. He is the managing partner at SmithMarco\, P.C.\, which he established in 2005. Larry has tried dozens of consumer rights cases to verdict in the state and federal courts of Illinois\, Georgia\, and Wisconsin and has arbitrated more than 700 cases. Additionally\, he has amicably resolved over 4\,000 consumer fraud\, FCRA\, and FDCPA cases via settlement. \nJames M. Pietz is a plaintiffs’ class action attorney who has litigated many different consumer class actions over the last thirty years in state and federal courts around the country. Jim is a partner with the Pittsburgh law firm of Feinstein Doyle Payne & Kravec\, LLC. He has litigated class actions under the FCRA\, FDCPA\, and RICO\, as well as under various state debt collection or consumer fraud/UDAP statutes. He has handled numerous appeals in state and federal courts of appeal involving significant or systemic issues in complex consumer class litigation.
URL:https://www.consumeradvocates.org/events/online-training-courses/navigating-a-state-practice-post-ramirez/
CATEGORIES:Online Training Courses
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR