This webinar will discuss “Imposter Scams,” one of the top scams hitting consumers this year. In these scams, con artists pretend to call from government offices, well-known businesses, or other trusted sources and convince consumers to give money or personal information. The webinar will highlight some of the popular impersonator schemes that are most likely to defraud low-income and diverse communities and will provide practical advice to help consumers contacting your offices about these scams. The webinar will also include other updates from the Federal Trade Commission.
Many consumer protection cases are litigated under fee-shifting laws. If you prevail on behalf of the consumer in your case, you may be able to recover attorney fees from the other side. Many consumer protection attorneys are well versed on the substantive law that allows them to prevail on behalf of their clients. This webinar discusses the next step: how to prepare for and conduct an evidentiary hearing to ethically increase your chances of recovering the full amount of attorney fees to which you may be entitled.
If you could get paid for all the time you give away, wouldn’t you? As consumer lawyers, we often feel we have to give our time generously because our clients and potential clients are usually in terrible financial straits; but not every consumer in need of assistance is a pro bono case. This webinar will show you how to capture the income you are giving away every day from people you talk to who you’d like to help, but don’t think you can because their case isn’t “ripe,” or because they say they can’t afford to pay for your help.
This practical seminar will provide tips on how to thrive while doing good consumer work Included will be basics on what kind of practice to establish, how to select areas of concentration and how to pick good cases and good clients. It will also discuss how to work the cases and chart their progress in order to keep the income flowing.
Maintaining a practice concentrating on claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act comes with its own ethical challenges. Join us July 1st for a Webinar by David J. Philipps, a NACA founding member with over 25 years of experience in working with the FDCPA. A range of topics taken directly from his experience as founding and senior partner in his firm will include:
Legal ethics is a minefield for the unwary lawyer. The program will address common ethics issues that arise in handling consumer matters, including whether one can ethically suggest that a client record telephone calls, issues raised in representing multiple consumers against a single defendant, defendants' efforts to keep information and settlement terms confidential, and ethical requirements when communicating with potential clients. In addition, the program will address recent ethics opinions that may affect consumer-litigation on both an individual and a class basis.
As the saying goes, your case is only as good as your client. And success in any FDCPA case starts with a great client intake. Asking all the right questions, at the right time, will make all the difference in the success of your FDCPA case. The right intake will also determine how much money you'll put in your pocket at the end of day. Don't shortcut the critical intake process and create nightmares down the road. Rather, learn the right way to do an intake to get great results and happy clients.
Consumer attorneys frequently encounter a specific set of ethics dilemmas that are unique to consumer cases. Unlike the typically broad, sweeping Ethics Overview CLE, this interactive online course is designed specifically with the consumer attorney in mind. Ethics expert and Director of Litigation at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, Stephen Gardner, will cover four pressing ethics areas for consumer law practitioners.
This webinar will cover the following topics that always come up in an auto fraud practice:
Whether they are confused, scared, or just plain dishonest, sometimes clients don’t tell the truth. In this webinar, you will learn what ethical choices and responsibilities a lawyer may face upon learning that a client has lied either to the lawyer, in non-litigation documents, or to a tribunal.