Amicus Brief filed in the case of Irene Hoffman, et al, v. Northern States Power Company, D/B/A Excel Energy, No. A062275 of the State of MInnesota Supreme Court
The Lower Court created new law when it barred judicial rate interpretation and ignored this court’s binding precendent to the contrary. The Lower Court’s ruling would deprive Minnesota courts of…
Read MoreAmicus Brief on NAF’s Abuse of Consumers in Debt Collection Cases
This case poses a simple question, which is of great consequence to Louisiana consumers: in a judicial proceeding to confirm an arbitration award, must the plantiff prove that the parties…
Read MoreAmicus Brief in the case of Joseph Iannacchino, Victor Marchese and Soledad Berrios v. Ford Motor Company
This brief of amici curiae in support of the Iannacchino plaintiffs-appellants is collectively submitted by seven public interest organizations including NACA.
Read MoreThe Subprime Lending Crisis and Its Effect in Maryland
Amicus Brief, written by Greg Care of Public Justice Center, supporting a constitutional challenge to Maryland’s forclosure laws.
Read MoreSafeco v. Burr / Geico v. Edo Final Amicus Brief
NACA’s amicus brief in Safeco v. Burr and Geico v. Edo Fair Credit Reporting cases before the United States Supreme Court.
Read MoreSharon A. Price, et al., v. Philip Morris Incorporated, Supreme Court of the United States
Brief by NACA and other consumer organizations stating that the Illinois Supreme Court erred in concluding that FTC consent orders constitute federal authorization to engage in deceptive advertising, and that…
Read MoreMike Hatch, Attorney General of Minnesota, v. CELLCO Partnership, D/B/A Verizon Wireless, et al., Supreme Court of the United States
NACA brief written to express the following: that the need for state wireless consumer protection laws has grown with the wireless industry, a growth that has been accompanied by widespread…
Read MoreCanieva Hood and Congress of California Seniors v. Santa Barbara Bank & Trust and Pacific Capital Bank, N.A., Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara, Case No. 1156354
This brief states that the judgement of the Superior Court should be reversed because the OCC’s poor track record enforcing consumer protection laws shows that it cannot be trusted with…
Read MoreWadley v. Experian, 4th District Court, Final
The District Court erroneously accepted Experian’s “accuracy only” argument and improperly dismissed the claim regarding its reinventigation duties. Because the District Court was misled by Experian regarding both the statutory…
Read More