US Supreme Court

Trump v. Slaughter

NACA recently joined an amicus brief that was filed in the Supreme Court of the United States alongside dozens of other consumer groups to support the Commissioners of the Federal…

Ohio et al vs. American Express

Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners in Ohio et al vs. American Express

Ricky Hanson et al vs. Santander Consumer USA, Inc

Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners in Ricky Hanson et al vs. Santander Consumer USA, Inc

Amicus Brief in Support of Respondents in Mark J. Sherriff, et al, v. Pamela Gillie and Hazel Meadows

Amicus Curiae Brief Supporting Larry D. Jesinoski in Larry D. Jesinoski, et ux, Petitioners VS Countrywide Home Loans, et al, Respondants

This brief supports Larry D. Jesinoski in petitioning respondants who are asking Congress to rewrite part of the Truth in Lending Act to make it less accommodating for consumers.

Marcus D. Mims v. Financial Services, LLC, No. 10-1195 in the Supreme Court of the United States

The current split among the circuits is profound and irreconcilable, and this unsettled jurisprudence has impaired TCPA enforcement while aiding industry non-compliance.

AT&T Mobility LLC v. Vincent and Liza Concepcion; Supreme Court of the United States; Case No. 09-893; On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Aggregate action is often essential to secure relief for consumers and to hold businesses accountable for wrongdoing. Businesses have adopted class-action bans to prevent consumers from bringing legitimate claims.

Rent-A-Center West, Inc v. Antonio Jackson, The Supreme Court of the United States, No. 09-497, March 31, 2010

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit correctly held below that, under the FAA, a court must decide a threshold dispute over whether an arbitration clause is enforceable…