Amicus Curiae Brief Supporting Larry D. Jesinoski in Larry D. Jesinoski, et ux, Petitioners VS Countrywide Home Loans, et al, Respondants

This brief supports Larry D. Jesinoski in petitioning respondants who are asking Congress to rewrite part of the Truth in Lending Act to make it less accommodating for consumers.

Read More

Amicus Curiae Brief Supporting Christina Grimes in Christina Grimes VS Enterprise Leasing Company of Philadelphia

This brief supports the Court’s decision in favor of Christina Grimes in her case against Enterprise Leasing Co. for practicing improper conduct while attempting to collect a debt.

Read More

Amicus Curiae Brief Supporting William D. Butts in Sikorsky Financial Credit Union, Inc VS William D. Butts

This brief is supports William D. Butts in his case against Sikorsky Financial Credit Union regarding car repossession.

Read More

Amici Curiae Brief Supporting Subodh Raysoni, Appellant, Case No. S13G1826. Supreme Court of Georgia

This brief supports the Appellant’s positions on its claims under the Fair Business Practices Act and request that the Court reverse the Georgia Court of Appeals’ determination that contractual language…

Read More

Amici Brief Supporting Disclosures on Food Labeling Packaging

The amici brief focuses on the far reaching consequences for consumers of food and other products regarding the standard of First Amendment review applied to the disclosures on food labeling…

Read More

Brief of Amici Curiae AARP, National Association of Consumer Advocates, and National Consumer Law Center in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees Urging Affirmance

Read More

Amicus Curiae Brief Expressions Hair Design v. Eric Schneiderman

Amicus Curiae Brief Expressions Hair Design v. Eric Schneiderman

Read More

Amicus Curiae Brief for Berman v. NYC 

Amicus Curiae Brief for Berman v. NYC

Read More

Curtis Amicus Brief Requesting the Overturn of the “Public Benefit” Restriction

This Court should overturn the “public benefit” restriction created in Ly v. Nystrom, 615 N.W.2d 302 (Minn. 2000). That decision required private plaintiffs to demonstrate that the alleged deceptive conduct…

Read More