Amicus Briefs

August 11, 2014 | Filed under: Credit Reporting
US District Court - Middle District of Northern California

This brief requests that the Court deny the defendant's motion to dismiss this case regarding fair reporting on criminal background checks.  

July 30, 2014 | Filed under: Mortgage, Real Estate & Housing
US Supreme Court

This brief supports Larry D. Jesinoski in petitioning respondants who are asking Congress to rewrite part of the Truth in Lending Act to make it less accommodating for consumers.

July 1, 2014 | Filed under: Debt Collection
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

This brief supports the Court's decision in favor of Christina Grimes in her case against Enterprise Leasing Co. for practicing improper conduct while attempting to collect a debt.

June 25, 2014 | Filed under: Automobiles
Supreme Court of Connecticut

This brief is supports William D. Butts in his case against Sikorsky Financial Credit Union regarding car repossession. 

May 19, 2014 | Filed under: Other Areas of Interest | Tagged with: Consumer Loans
Supreme Court of Georgia

This brief supports the Appellant's positions on its claims under the Fair Business Practices Act and request that the Court reverse the Georgia Court of Appeals’ determination that contractual language may defeat a FBPA claim as a matter of law.

April 21, 2014 | Filed under: Other Areas of Interest | Tagged with: food labeling
US District Court - District of Columbia

The amici brief focuses on the far reaching consequences for consumers of food and other products regarding the standard of First Amendment review applied to the disclosures on food labeling packaging.

July 6, 2013 | Filed under: Other Areas of Interest | Tagged with: Credit Cards
US District Court - Southern District of New York

Amicus Curiae Brief Expressions Hair Design v. Eric Schneiderman

June 6, 2013 | Filed under: Debt Collection
US District Court - Eastern District of New York

Amicus Curiae Brief for Berman v. NYC 

September 27, 2011 | Filed under: Class Actions
Supreme Court of New Mexico

Adoption of Defendants’ position would be the death knell of virtually all meaningful enforcement of the Unfair Practices Act (UPA), NMSA 1978, §§ 57-12-1 to -22.