Strange v. Capital One, D. Maryland Case No. 8:25-cv-02711
Case Summary: Case against Capital One for violation of Virginia usury statute which limits interest to 6% (unless otherwise permitted by contract). Complaint alleges that Capital One’s consumer contract permitting a higher interest rate is illusory because it allows the company to unilaterally change the contract terms. With no enforceable contract, Capital One is limited to charging a 6% interest rate. Complaint alleges violations of the Maryland Consumer Debt Collection Act and Consumer Protection Act, and the National Bank Act.
Case Documents:
Complaint (7/16/2025)
Amended Complaint (10/17/2025)
NACA's
Practice Areas
Browse Our
Attorney Directory
Press Inquiries
For press inquiries, contact Ira Rheingold.
To be added to our press/media mailing list, please contact Christine Hines.
